Use of Persuasive Argument in 12 Angry Men Essay - 1037 Words

The movie â€Å"12 Angry Men† examines the dynamics at play in a United States jury room in the 1950’s. It revolves around the opinions and mindsets of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie in 1957, produced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role, Juror #8, and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay. This essay will explore some of the critical thinking elements found within the context of this movie, and will show that rational reason and logic when used effectively can overcome the mostly ineffective rush to judgment that can be prevalent in†¦show more content†¦The old man gave evidence that he heard the boy say â€Å"I’ll kill you† from his apartment below and that he saw the boy running from the down the stairs from the apartment after risin g from his bedroom. The old lady saw the boy kill his father through her window, whilst a train was passing. Juror #8 analyses each of these points and makes credible arguments that the conclusion is flawed based on incorrect reasoning, by pointing out inconsistencies in the conclusions reached. The other jurors are content to believe that their reasoning is solid, as they have used examples of deductive reasoning to reach their conclusion. Juror #3 gives his reasons for reaching the conclusion that â€Å"It’s quite clear that the boy never went to the movies that night, returned home and killed his father with the knife as identified in Court† (Fonda Lumet, 1957). Until Juror #8 takes out a similar knife and poses the question that it was possible that another knife was used, Juror #7 calls it a million to one however Juror #8 persists in saying it was possible. He also uses this analysis method to cast aspersions on the second point and third points raised by syste matically analyzing each component. During the course of the debate within the jury room Juror #8 summarizes the evidence presented and the conclusions drawn by his fellow jurors, by asking questions. He analyzes the content, by breaking down the component parts and analyzing eachShow MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Movie 12 Angry Man Essay1192 Words   |  5 Pagesgovernment teacher, once said â€Å"Law without enforcement is just suggestion.† It is true that equality is important for citizens, but there is no point of publishing equality law without enforcing the law. The justice system is a way to enforce the law. 12 Angry Man is a movie about a jury that decides on the fate of teenage boy. The jury in the movie is a similar presentation of the the figure. The boy was given the right to a fair trial, but that does not mean it was enforced. During the the deliberationRead MoreHow Did Henry Fonda Turn The Jury?1114 Words   |  5 PagesHow did Henry Fonda Turn the Jury? The movie, ’12 Angry Men’ showcases the trial of a young boy, who is accused of stabbing his father and causing him death. Throughout the play, the jury is able to follow through the actions of 12 men, who compose the jury. All of these men come from different backgrounds and the most astounding feature of the movie is in the manner that the experiences and personalities of these members of the jury influences their initial perception of the case. The personal biasRead MoreMovie Analysis : 12 Angry Men1639 Words   |  7 Pagesgroup.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of cooperative communities while providing different aspects of leadership. Movie Summary The movie 12 Angry Men is a depiction of a jury deliberation in the 1950’s involving the trial of a teenager that is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men were brought together by a random selection process to make a unanimous decision. In the beginning, all jurors believed the boy to be guilty without a doubt, except for oneRead MoreThe Classic 1957 Movie 12 Angry Men Delves In To A Panel1008 Words   |  5 Pages The classic 1957 movie 12 Angry Men delves in to a panel of twelve jurors who are deciding the life or death fate of an eighteen year old italian boy accused of stabbing his father to death. The twelve men selected as jurors are a diverse group, each coming to the table with their own socioeconomic backgrounds, personal experiences, prejudice’s, and all of this plays a role in the jurors attitudes and/or misconceptions of the accused young man. How each of the jurors, all but Juror Eight playedRead More12 Angry Men Leadership Essay1711 Words   |  7 Pages12 Angry Men is a film originally produced in 1957 by Henry Fonda and Reginald Rose. It is about the journey 12 jurors go on to determine if a defendant is innocent or guilty. 12 Angry Men is a classic movie that is great for people learning different leadership styles, verbal and nonverbal cues, constructive/destructive conflict, and how ‘sidebar’ conversations impact a group’s ability to achieve their goal. The goal of the 12 jurors is to make a unanimous decision the defendant is either innocentRead MoreEssay about Persuasion in 12 Angry Men984 Words   |  4 PagesNecessary Art of Persuasion†, Jay Conger stated that persuasion is NOT about selling or convincing; rather, it is a learning and negotiating process. Good persuaders use and listen to ongoing and active discussions (or debates) to learn about their audience and include different opinions into a shared conclusion. In the movie â€Å"12 Angry Men†, juror number 8 (Henry Fonda) was not sure if evidence presented against a young defendant in court left reasonable doubt for a guilty conviction. The other jurorsRead MoreTwelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose2197 Words   |  9 Pagesor this project we viewed the original 1957 version of Twelve Angry Men, an American Drama, adapted from the teleplay written by Reginald Rose with the same name starring Henry Fonda as the lead role. The film begins in New York City in a courthouse, it is clear by the expressions on everyone’s face including the judge that everyone is tired and it has been a long trial. The viewers are told that an unidentified, young Hispanic male originating from the slums is on trial for supposedly stabbing hisRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Thoreau’s â€Å"Civil Disobedience†1570 Words   |  7 PagesRepeated use of the â€Å"machine† metaphor when referring to the government and politicians/lawyers who work for it. Sets up an â€Å"Us† (free-minded, free-thinking citizens who rebel against slavery) versus â€Å"Them† (the government machine and those who would support it, as well as those who talk but don’t act against it). He uses â€Å"We† a lot, further emphasizing this division against government, but also the unity of people who agree with his points, a â€Å"we’re in this together† kind of thing. Repeated use of wor dsRead More12 Angry Men: Movie1698 Words   |  7 Pages12 Angry Men In a world where the jury is the voice of the peoples justice, twelve men sit in a room poised to determine the fate of one boys life. Did he do it? If he didnt, who did? Why would a young man kill his beloved father with a switchblade knife? The moment that the jury-comprised of twelve Caucasian men, abhorrent in todays society-entered the small, blank, bleak room, they had already come to the conclusion that the young man was guilty as charged without deliberation.Read MoreMovie Review : My Biggest Pet Peeves1440 Words   |  6 Pages One of my biggest pet peeves when it comes to movies is how the ending occurs. Whether it is a happily every after, or a dark turn of events, as long as the flick doesn’t end abrupt I will most likely enjoy it. 12 Angry Men went the other direction. Resulting in a cliffhanger to end without telling the audience whether or not the boy actually did the crime. Compelling, yet thrilling as the director left a big question mark at the end of this film. The jurors in this film each had their own personality